Vocamp 2008 Ontologies
Following on from vocamp I’ve got the ontologies I’m working with straightened out and about to be published.
First of all, I’ve made changes to aiiso (the academic institution internal structures ontology) to integrate it with foaf. Basically what I’ve done is deprecate the original aiiso:organisationalUnit and subclass all of the aiiso: classes for departments, faculties etc from foaf:Organization directly. This should allow them to work with other ontologies designed to work with foaf.
Next, the organisationalUnit and knowledgeGrouping have been deprecated. The organisationalUnit property has been replaced by organisation and joined by an inverse property of organizationWithin which hopefully makes the intentional direction clear. These are both declared with a domain and range of foaf:Organization, allowing them to be used on other places foaf is being used.
Chris Wallace and I then spent some time modelling how people participate in institutions. We concluded that we could easily make the participation vocab general enough to use anywhere. Participation specifies the way a foaf:Agent (Organization, Person or Group) participates in a foaf:Group or foaf:Organization.
Having modelled it we discovered that Knud Moeller had arrived at the same model as we had when modelling participation in conferences. The only difference we had was that we were modelling different types of role (Chair, Speaker, Chancellor) as individuals and Knud was modelling them as subclasses of a Role class. After much debate I made the decision to spec Participation to use subclassing in the same way Knud had.
Chris then kindly pulled a set of roles out of one of his existing databases and we’re publishing those under the aiiso-roles companion schema. This model means that Participation contains the details of how different things relate while different domains are free to create lists of roles that others can then re-use. Aiiso-roles is a first draft of how to do it, rather than a considered list of role titles in academia. Please suggest edits when it gets put online.
I had hoped to spend some time on the Lifecycle ontology, but with everything else being discussed it just didn’t happen. Though I did do a run-through of it with Knud as his PhD is on lifecycle of data and documents online. I hope it can be of some use to him.
The changes aren’t published yet, but will be soon, I promise.
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Additional comments powered by BackType
Search
What I'm Doing...
- @moustaki, would you recommend an equivalent to music ontology for visual recordings? 1 day ago
- @chriskeene Does the uni have it's own local weather system? (http://twitter.com/chriskeene/status/10314171215 and go left) in reply to chriskeene 1 day ago
- @_philjohn should I expect a late arrival then? in reply to _philjohn 1 day ago
- More updates...
Recent Comments
- Patents are Property – Like it or Not « Chasing the Power Curve on When Patents Go Wrong…
- Arizona Joe on Fixing a plasma TV
- alex_turner11 on Ground roundup of new eReaders at CES on CNN
- negative_charge on Hacking Into Your Account is as Easy as 123456
- infopeep on Hacking Into Your Account is as Easy as 123456
- BenenhaleyBrian on The 18 Mistakes That Kill Startups
- Brian Benenhaley on The 18 Mistakes That Kill Startups
- infopeep on The 18 Mistakes That Kill Startups
- Rob Styles on Ruby Mock Web Server
- Jim on Fixing a plasma TV
Categories
- .Net Technical (8)
- Blog on Blog (6)
- commands I have issued (9)
- Enterprise Architecture (19)
- event (4)
- Fiction Book Review (2)
- Food (2)
- Intellectual Property (9)
- Interaction Design (27)
- Internet Social Impact (43)
- Internet Technical (16)
- IP Law (10)
- Library Tech (19)
- Music (2)
- New Toy (4)
- Non-Fiction Book Review (7)
- Ontologies (6)
- Open Data (7)
- Other Technical (20)
- Personal (36)
- Random Thought (16)
- Resourcing (4)
- Review (1)
- Security And Privacy (11)
- Semantic Web (30)
- Software Business (10)
- Software Engineering (37)
- Talis Technical (9)
- Uncategorized (44)
- Working at Talis (26)
- [grid::blogpaper] (8)
- [grid::fatherhood] (4)
Archives
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (4)
- November 2009 (10)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (12)
- June 2009 (5)
- May 2009 (6)
- April 2009 (7)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (10)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (23)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (6)
- April 2008 (14)
- March 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (6)
- November 2007 (13)
- October 2007 (9)
- July 2007 (2)
- June 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (10)
- April 2007 (5)
- March 2007 (11)
- February 2007 (10)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (8)
- November 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (2)
- August 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (2)
- February 2006 (2)
- January 2006 (3)
- December 2005 (3)
- November 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (2)
- August 2005 (5)
- July 2005 (8)
- June 2005 (3)
- May 2005 (2)
- February 2005 (1)
- January 2005 (4)
- December 2004 (3)
- November 2004 (6)
- October 2004 (2)
- September 2004 (2)
- August 2004 (5)
- July 2004 (1)
- June 2004 (4)
- May 2004 (4)
- April 2004 (3)
- March 2004 (13)
- February 2004 (6)
- December 2003 (3)
- November 2003 (1)
- August 2003 (2)
- July 2003 (1)
- June 2003 (2)
- May 2003 (1)
- March 2003 (1)
- January 2003 (1)
- October 2002 (1)
- May 2002 (1)
- March 2002 (1)
- August 2001 (1)
- May 2001 (1)
- April 2001 (1)
- January 2001 (1)
- December 2000 (1)
- November 2000 (1)
- December 1999 (1)
- November 1999 (1)
- July 1999 (1)