<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Patents Go Wrong&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=when-patents-go-wrong</link>
	<description>A low-frequency blog by Rob Styles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patents are Property – Like it or Not « Chasing the Power Curve</title>
		<link>http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/#comment-4509</link>
		<dc:creator>Patents are Property – Like it or Not « Chasing the Power Curve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicorange.com/?p=400#comment-4509</guid>
		<description>[...] good things on that.  But I&#8217;ve also seen some posts that are really rather silly, like this one where the author claims that since a great invention could not be copied by several manufactures [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good things on that.  But I&#8217;ve also seen some posts that are really rather silly, like this one where the author claims that since a great invention could not be copied by several manufactures [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Styles</title>
		<link>http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/#comment-4508</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Styles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicorange.com/?p=400#comment-4508</guid>
		<description>Brett,

I can see why you read the post that way, and on re-reading I should have been much clearer. I agree with the principles o both Copyright and Patent law and support them. However, they do have a downside, and that downside is that some companies rest on their laurels - as Sleep Time Bunny appears to have.

What I see as a concern here is not the patent system in general, but simply that their is an absence of any mechanism to ensure that an invention is used to the greatest effect. Patent squatting if you like.

rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett,</p>
<p>I can see why you read the post that way, and on re-reading I should have been much clearer. I agree with the principles o both Copyright and Patent law and support them. However, they do have a downside, and that downside is that some companies rest on their laurels &#8211; as Sleep Time Bunny appears to have.</p>
<p>What I see as a concern here is not the patent system in general, but simply that their is an absence of any mechanism to ensure that an invention is used to the greatest effect. Patent squatting if you like.</p>
<p>rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Trout</title>
		<link>http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Trout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicorange.com/?p=400#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Rob,

   You are taking a very short-sighted view on the issue of patent monopolies. Sure, it would be better for everyone today to invalidate patents, but what about 10, 50, 100 years down the road?

   Who is going to spend money inventing anything new, if free-loading competitors are simply allowed to steal the market out from under them. Monopoly profits are what drive innovation.

   I realize that means twenty years before your bunny clock is cheaper, but it also means that thousands of drugs, costing billions to develop, are currently off patent and available to you at generic prices.

   There is simply no industrialized nation that has ever seriously considered crippling innovation by getting rid of patents on mechanical inventions. No one can dispute that mechanical patents benefit society over the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>   You are taking a very short-sighted view on the issue of patent monopolies. Sure, it would be better for everyone today to invalidate patents, but what about 10, 50, 100 years down the road?</p>
<p>   Who is going to spend money inventing anything new, if free-loading competitors are simply allowed to steal the market out from under them. Monopoly profits are what drive innovation.</p>
<p>   I realize that means twenty years before your bunny clock is cheaper, but it also means that thousands of drugs, costing billions to develop, are currently off patent and available to you at generic prices.</p>
<p>   There is simply no industrialized nation that has ever seriously considered crippling innovation by getting rid of patents on mechanical inventions. No one can dispute that mechanical patents benefit society over the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/#comment-4506</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicorange.com/?p=400#comment-4506</guid>
		<description>Che loves it.  He stands on his wipe warmer to set it every night and says &quot;Night night&quot; to the bunny when he&#039;s being put to bed.

Of course, since he&#039;s gone to the &quot;big boy bed&quot;, it&#039;s sort of thrown the night night bunny rule out the window, since he wakes up and turns on the overhead light every morning about 20 minutes before &quot;night night bunny wakes up&quot;.

But while he was in his crib, it worked like a charm.  I suspect once he&#039;s into a routine again (and the night night bunny is in a better vantage point), he&#039;ll go back to respecting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Che loves it.  He stands on his wipe warmer to set it every night and says &#8220;Night night&#8221; to the bunny when he&#8217;s being put to bed.</p>
<p>Of course, since he&#8217;s gone to the &#8220;big boy bed&#8221;, it&#8217;s sort of thrown the night night bunny rule out the window, since he wakes up and turns on the overhead light every morning about 20 minutes before &#8220;night night bunny wakes up&#8221;.</p>
<p>But while he was in his crib, it worked like a charm.  I suspect once he&#8217;s into a routine again (and the night night bunny is in a better vantage point), he&#8217;ll go back to respecting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Styles</title>
		<link>http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/#comment-4505</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Styles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicorange.com/?p=400#comment-4505</guid>
		<description>Awesome, now that&#039;s much closer to Sleep Time Bunny than I was expecting to see - but being digital and not changing the face means it doesn&#039;t infringe on the claims IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, now that&#8217;s much closer to Sleep Time Bunny than I was expecting to see &#8211; but being digital and not changing the face means it doesn&#8217;t infringe on the claims IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://dynamicorange.com/2009/01/19/when-patents-go-wrong/#comment-4504</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicorange.com/?p=400#comment-4504</guid>
		<description>We have this:  http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/04/kidsleep_clock_.html

Which seems, in almost every respect, &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; the same concept, only digital.  And, in that regard, meets your requirement (since it&#039;s a 24 hour clock).

It was a little pricey (no doubt to pay the patent license :)), but works quite well for Che (who is two and a half and definitely on the lower end for the product).

BTW, there is &lt;em&gt;nothing&lt;/em&gt; like this, that we have found, in the States.  We had to import ours from the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have this:  <a href="http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/04/kidsleep_clock_.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/04/kidsleep_clock_.html</a></p>
<p>Which seems, in almost every respect, <em>exactly</em> the same concept, only digital.  And, in that regard, meets your requirement (since it&#8217;s a 24 hour clock).</p>
<p>It was a little pricey (no doubt to pay the patent license <img src='http://dynamicorange.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), but works quite well for Che (who is two and a half and definitely on the lower end for the product).</p>
<p>BTW, there is <em>nothing</em> like this, that we have found, in the States.  We had to import ours from the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

